The New Economist
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Analysis
    • Human Trafficking Features
  • Gossip
  • Life & Style
  • Opinions
    • Editorial
    • Columnists
      • Ikebesi Omoding
      • Isa Senkumba
      • Ramathan Ggoobi
    • Letters
  • Business
    • Corporate
  • Airlines
  • National Parks
The New Economist
  • Home
  • News
    • Analysis
    • Human Trafficking Features
  • Gossip
  • Life & Style
  • Opinions
    • Editorial
    • Columnists
      • Ikebesi Omoding
      • Isa Senkumba
      • Ramathan Ggoobi
    • Letters
  • Business
    • Corporate
  • Airlines
  • National Parks
No Result
View All Result
The New Economist
No Result
View All Result
Home Life & Style

Gaslighting and Emotional Manipulation

bySunrise reporter
September 3, 2016
in Life & Style
0
152
SHARES
1.9k
VIEWS
WhatsAppShare on TwitterFacebook

Gas-lighting

When someone talks about the woman who he broke up with because she called too often or seemed to get emotionally involved faster than he was comfortable with, or that she was always arguing with him about stuff or even that she wanted different things from the relationship, it’s not uncommon to hear; “That’s why you don’t stick it in the crazy.”

The man is always absolved of any responsibility for the break up; it’s not because he was willing to pretend to be on the same page as her regarding the future of the relationship because it was convenient and meant that he could continue sleeping with her, it’s because she was crazy. It’s not because he was unwilling to discuss her concerns. She’s crazy, case closed, time to move on to the next woman without pausing to reflect.

By dismissing a woman’s behavior or concerns as crazy, we inadvertently take part in a behavior known as “gaslighting.” Named for the classic George Cukor movie, gaslighting is a term used by psychologists to describe abusive behavior where a person is made to feel as though their emotions and reactions are irrational, even (dare I say) crazy.

By constantly minimizing and dismissing someone’s reactions, we make them feel uncomfortable with themselves and cause them to start  doubting  their own feelings. It is believed that when someone gets told over and over again that what they’re feeling is irrational or unreal, that what they’re feeling is somehow out of whack, then they start to accept that maybe it is. Even when it’s not.

Gaslighting — like  minimizing the feelings of the woman or reframing them as being unreasonable — is classic abusive behavior. It’s telling someone that they don’t have a right to the way they feel because what they’re feeling for you  is wrong. Their feelings or their concerns or behavior isn’t “rational.” Once you take away their right to their feelings, it’s that much easier to manipulate a person into the way you want them to behave.

Labeling women as “crazy” is a way of controlling them. It may not be something planned or pre-meditated, but the ease with which men call women “crazy” says a lot about them. Calling a woman “crazy” is quick and easy shut-down to any discussion. Once the “crazy” card has been pulled out, women are now put on the defensive:

The onus is no longer on the man to address her concerns or her issue; it’s on her to justify her behavior, to prove that she is not, in fact, crazy or irrational. Men don’t even have to provide any sort of argument on this.

It’s a classic catch-22: “The fact that you don’t even see that you’re acting crazy is just proof that it’s crazy.” On the 2nd of July 2016, I met this lady called Medina Asaba Birungi with my family and I liked her but everyone branded her “Crazy woman” not until I gave her my time; Oh my goodness she is the best wife material I have ever met, so developmental but had I followed what people had labeled her I wouldn’t have seen that side of her.

We may not intend to manipulate women this way — most of the time we’re not even aware that we’re doing it. Most of us are conditioned into it; it’s a part of the subtle background radiation that still teaches men  that women’s desires and opinions are secondary. But the fact that we don’t mean to cause harm doesn’t change the fact that we do without even thinking about it.

Comments

comments

Related Posts

HOCW’s Dr. Bolingo launches ‘Unlock the Mind’ Book
Arts

HOCW’s Dr. Bolingo launches ‘Unlock the Mind’ Book

byHattie Wright
January 24, 2024
0

Hope of Children and Women Victims of Violence (HOCW) Executive Director Dr. John Bolingo Ntahira has released his new book...

Read moreDetails
EC urged on civic education as  2021 electoral season hots-up

Justice Byabakama retains EC top job

January 11, 2024
Nothing will obstruct us, Ssenyonyi vows to hold govt accountable

Nothing will obstruct us, Ssenyonyi vows to hold govt accountable

January 11, 2024
Muhoozi: Who is targeting my supporters for elimination?

Muhoozi: Who is targeting my supporters for elimination?

January 4, 2024
Police issue statement on assassination attempt on Pastor Bugingo

Police issue statement on assassination attempt on Pastor Bugingo

January 4, 2024
Ssenyonyi replaces Mpuuga in new NUP shadow cabinet shake-up

Ssenyonyi replaces Mpuuga in new NUP shadow cabinet shake-up

January 24, 2024

Recent News

HOCW’s Dr. Bolingo launches ‘Unlock the Mind’ Book

HOCW’s Dr. Bolingo launches ‘Unlock the Mind’ Book

January 24, 2024
EC urged on civic education as  2021 electoral season hots-up

Justice Byabakama retains EC top job

January 11, 2024

Site Navigation

  • About us
  • Our Staff
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Support

The New Economist's major concentration is on Ugandan and East African affairs, politics, and business, but it also includes regular sections on science and technology, books, and the arts.

© 2024

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Analysis
    • Human Trafficking Features
  • Gossip
  • Life & Style
  • Opinions
    • Editorial
    • Columnists
      • Ikebesi Omoding
      • Isa Senkumba
      • Ramathan Ggoobi
    • Letters
  • Business
    • Corporate

© 2024